{"id":466,"date":"2016-06-30T11:26:09","date_gmt":"2016-06-30T11:26:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/?p=466"},"modified":"2016-08-30T11:43:13","modified_gmt":"2016-08-30T11:43:13","slug":"what-would-brexit-mean-for-efforts-to-tackle-climate-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/2016\/06\/30\/what-would-brexit-mean-for-efforts-to-tackle-climate-change\/","title":{"rendered":"What would Brexit mean for efforts to tackle climate change?"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Rick Lyons<\/h2>\n

Online MSc Carbon Management 2015-2016<\/h2>\n
\n

If, as according to superstition, wood provides reassurance when touched, then the Climate Change Act 2008<\/a> performs the same consoling function when it comes to Brexit and UK climate policy. \u201cWe won\u2019t be serious about tackling climate change without the guiding hand of the EU\u201d, people may fret, only to contemplate the solid legal fact of the Act and find their fears subsiding. And yes it\u2019s true that the Act, regardless of EU membership status, commits the country to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050<\/a>. But however ambitious this seems, the reassurance offered looks less and less solid the longer and harder you look.<\/p>\n

For a start, although the 2050 goal seems to lock Britain in long-term, in the global context of achieving net zero emissions some time before 2100<\/a>, it leaves fifty years unaccounted for. As Charlotte Burns of the University of York points out<\/a>, one justification for the stringent carbon budgets in the Act was that the UK would be required to meet them anyway under EU law. Out of the EU, and outside its obligations, it follows that carbon legislation for post-2050 may not be so tough. Then there\u2019s the possibility we don\u2019t adhere to the Act in the period to 2050. Even within the EU there are concerns about whether we will meet our carbon budgets<\/a>. Out of the EU this lack of commitment could transform into something much worse: a watering down of the Act or even, as UKIP<\/a>and some Tories<\/a> advocate, repeal.<\/p>\n

\"renewables<\/a>
Source: brinknews.com<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

It\u2019s worth remembering too that the UK\u2019s climate change mitigation efforts aren\u2019t just determined by our own Act: renewables targets are set by European directive. Under theRenewables Directive<\/a>, 15% of all energy consumed in the UK must come from renewable sources by 2020<\/a> \u2013 and another policy<\/a> commits the the EU as awhole to meeting 27% of final energy consumption through renewables by 2030. Although support for renewables is implicit in the Climate Change Act, EU legislation makes it explicit and clearly signposts the direction of travel for the industry. Without it, Britain\u2019s green\u00a0industry would have only the mixed messages<\/a>\u00a0of the UK government, investor confidence would be further undermined and a question mark placed and over its future.<\/p>\n

The position of renewables could also suffer because of Brexit\u2019s implications for energy security. Decreased interconnectivity of supply, reduced harmonisation of energy markets and less investment in the UK by multinational companies could all be consequences of leaving\u00a0according to a House of Commons briefing paper<\/a>. The resulting increase in energy insecurity\u00a0would \u201cincrease focus on all aspects of UK generation\u201d<\/a> it is thought. In other words it may become more important to generate enough electricity by whatever means \u2013 including via\u00a0gas and coal \u2013 than to meet renewables goals.<\/p>\n

Brexit also means participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme would no longer be compulsory<\/a>. The 1,000 or so UK installations<\/a> which currently take part could in theory continue to do so\u00a0under\u00a0a new voluntary agreement, but it is equally possible they will simply exploit a new freedom to emit once outside the cap and trade scheme.<\/p>\n

Beyond all this, of course, is the fact that global warming is (no surprises here) a global problem. It\u2019s important for the UK, as the 15th<\/sup> largest emitter<\/a>, to cut emissions, but we also need other countries to do the same. In the past Britain has challenged the EU to up the emission-cuts ante<\/a>, pushing back the horizon of ambition. Outside the EU there is little chance of this or indeed of exerting any influence on the rest of the continent\u2019s mitigation policy. Yes the UNFCCC offers a framework for the UK to influence global climate goals, but given the number of competing voices and the power of some of the players, it is unlikely a lone actor would wield much, if any, influence.<\/p>\n

Step aside from mitigation and you run into yet more problems. EU funding to tackle natural disasters<\/a> caused by climate change? Not if you\u2019re outside the union. Funding for climate research? Not as muchaccording to Julia Sligo of the Met Office<\/a>, who said Brexit would diminish the quality of their climate models and their climate advice.<\/p>\n

Taking the above together, it\u2019s difficult not to conclude that leaving reduces the likelihood of the UK making its rightful contribution to the cuts needed to avoid dangerous warming. It also lessens our ability to study and adapt to climate change \u2013 and if, as seems unlikely at the moment, the UK wants to push others to cut deeper, leaving the EU diminishes our ability to do so.<\/p>\n

Still, forget all that if you like and\u00a0look on the bright side. Leave or stay, there\u2019s always the Climate Change Act to fall back on. That\u2019s not going anywhere. (Touch wood.)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Full references for hard copy sources:<\/p>\n

Burns, C. (2013) The Implications for UK Environmental Policy of a Vote to Exit the EU<\/em>. Friends of The Earth.<\/p>\n

Miller, V. (2016) Exiting the EU: impact in key UK policy areas<\/em>. Briefing Paper Number 07213, House of Commons Library.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Rick Lyons Online MSc Carbon Management 2015-2016 If, as according to superstition, wood provides reassurance when touched, then the Climate Change Act 2008 performs the same consoling function when it comes to Brexit and UK climate policy. \u201cWe won\u2019t … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":114,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[207,203,206,157,19,209,208],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/466"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/114"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=466"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/466\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":481,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/466\/revisions\/481"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/global-environment-society-academy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}