{"id":677,"date":"2016-05-12T14:08:32","date_gmt":"2016-05-12T14:08:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/?p=677"},"modified":"2016-05-23T23:41:41","modified_gmt":"2016-05-23T23:41:41","slug":"elizabeth-ashford-hungers-unwitting-executioners","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/2016\/05\/12\/elizabeth-ashford-hungers-unwitting-executioners\/","title":{"rendered":"Elizabeth Ashford &#8211; Hunger\u2019s Unwitting Executioners"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/research\/political_theory\" target=\"_blank\">Political Theory Research Group<\/a> seminar series: 11 May 2016<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_678\" style=\"width: 382px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/files\/2016\/05\/UDHR-UN-photo.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-678\" class=\" wp-image-678\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/files\/2016\/05\/UDHR-UN-photo-1024x1016.jpg\" alt=\"Photo: United Nations\" width=\"372\" height=\"369\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/files\/2016\/05\/UDHR-UN-photo-1024x1016.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/files\/2016\/05\/UDHR-UN-photo-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/files\/2016\/05\/UDHR-UN-photo-300x298.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/files\/2016\/05\/UDHR-UN-photo-768x762.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/files\/2016\/05\/UDHR-UN-photo-624x619.jpg 624w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 372px) 100vw, 372px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-678\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: United Nations<\/p><\/div>\n<p>In \u201cHunger\u2019s Unwitting Executioners\u201d, Elizabeth Ashford argues that the persistence of severe poverty should be understood as a structural human rights violation, and that defending this thesis does not require defending the more contentious claims of theorists such as Thomas Pogge. On her analysis, the persistence of severe poverty is a predictable, avoidable, and unjustifiable infliction of severe harm, caused by ongoing patterns of behaviour at a global level. Crucially, she does not target responsibility exclusively on existing coercive social institutions, but rather identifies a \u2018shared duty to prevent structural human rights violations\u2019 that is held by individuals born in affluent countries, wherein each is partially responsible for its fulfilment. This duty can be discharged by taking action for structural reform.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>As Elizabeth points out, structural change tends to happen only after a \u2018tipping point in moral norms\u2019 is reached, which suggests the possibility of discharging one\u2019s partial responsibility by contributing to a shift in predominant social and moral norms. If an individual does not do their part to promote structural reform, they are culpable for \u2018a kind of moral bad faith\u2019 \u2013 failure to acknowledge or take responsibility for one\u2019s role in the persistence of severe poverty.<\/p>\n<p>Our seminar discussion was varied and engaging. The significance of presenting the argument in human rights language was questioned \u2013 is there an assumption that \u2018rights violations\u2019 will be likely to motivate people to take action? If so, what particular actions would this analysis mandate? Further, it was suggested that many of the paper\u2019s empirical claims may still be contentious for critics of Pogge, particularly those relying on backward-looking historical harms of institutions like colonialism.<\/p>\n<p><em>Written by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pol.ed.ac.uk\/people\/phd_students\/christina_dineen\" target=\"_blank\">Christina Dineen<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>****<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.st-andrews.ac.uk\/philosophy\/dept\/staffprofiles\/?staffid=92\" target=\"_blank\">Elizabeth Ashford<\/a> is\u00a0Senior Lecturer in Moral Philosophy at the University of St Andrews.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Political Theory Research Group seminar series: 11 May 2016 In \u201cHunger\u2019s Unwitting Executioners\u201d, Elizabeth Ashford argues that the persistence of severe poverty should be understood as a structural human rights violation, and that defending this thesis does not require defending the more contentious claims of theorists such as Thomas Pogge. On her analysis, the persistence [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":189,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,29,22,8,1],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/677"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/189"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=677"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/677\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":679,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/677\/revisions\/679"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/jwi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}