{"id":619,"date":"2013-09-23T07:13:23","date_gmt":"2013-09-23T07:13:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/?p=619"},"modified":"2013-09-23T07:13:23","modified_gmt":"2013-09-23T07:13:23","slug":"the-receding-tape","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/the-receding-tape\/","title":{"rendered":"The Receding Tape"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_620\" style=\"width: 196px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/files\/2013\/09\/Neil-Walker.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-620\" class=\"size-full wp-image-620\" alt=\"Neil Walker, University of Edinburgh\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/files\/2013\/09\/Neil-Walker.jpg\" width=\"186\" height=\"224\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-620\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Neil Walker, University of Edinburgh<\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>In a post published at the Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum, Neil Walker reflects on the implications of the referendum, questioning whether it will provide a decisive conclusion.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">And so the countdown begins. But the countdown to what? Twelve months from now we should know the result of the referendum, but just how significant a marker will that be on Scotland&#8217;s constitutional journey?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">One popular view &#8211; for many less a reasoned view than a deep-rooted assumption &#8211; maintains that the referendum will be decisive and conclusive of Scotland&#8217;s future constitutional shape and status. The contemporary history of the Scottish national debate began with Winnie Ewing&#8217;s by-election success in Hamilton in 1967, continued through the abortive devolution referendum of 1979, and reached a new pitch with the successful plebiscite of 1998 and the election of the new Scottish Parliament in 1999. According to the conventional narrative, this long Scottish constitutional &#8216;moment&#8217; is now drawing to an end, the independence referendum scheduled for September 2014 its final act. And despite some early mutterings from the side-lines about the inclusion of a third &#8216;devo-max&#8217; option on the ballot paper, that final act\u00a0 will consist of a straight choice between &#8216;yes&#8217; or &#8216;no&#8217;, &#8216;out&#8217; or &#8216;in&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><div class=\"simplePullQuote right\"><p>Independence will cease to be an abstract and free-floating idea. It will instead begin to look like a substantive blueprint. And this will serve to reinforce a sense of the debate as a binary choice<\/p>\n<\/div><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">But why should we conclude that the availability of a\u00a0 straight choice to stay or leave &#8211; the first such choice offered the Scottish people in over three centuries of Union, will settle matters once and for all?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Read the rest of Neil Walker&#8217;s analysis at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scottishconstitutionalfutures.org\/OpinionandAnalysis\/ViewBlogPost\/tabid\/1767\/articleType\/ArticleView\/articleId\/2236\/Neil-Walker-The-Receding-Tape.aspx\">Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>Neil Walker is Regius Professor of Public Law and the Law of Nations at the University of Edinburgh.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a post published at the Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum, Neil Walker reflects on the implications of the referendum, questioning whether it will provide a decisive conclusion. And so the countdown begins. But the countdown to what? Twelve months from &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/the-receding-tape\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=619"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":622,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619\/revisions\/622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sps.ed.ac.uk\/referendum\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}