We have just completed our two year, data collection and analysis of child protection and safeguarding referrals and assessment outcomes for the project \u2018Rethinking Child Protection Strategy\u2019, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (Grant number ES\/M000990\/1). The large-scale, secondary data analysis covers data from the past 25 years in England, giving a picture of what has happened since the implementation of the Children Act 1989.\u00a0 Although this study was located in England, its findings are relevant to all parts of the UK.<\/p>\n
Since the passing of the 1989 Act, various strategies have been adopted by successive governments in England with the aim of reducing child abuse and improving children\u2019s welfare. These approaches have attempted to reconcile the local authorities\u2019 dual aims: to \u2018safeguard and promote the welfare of children who are in need\u2019 (s.47) and to investigate whether action needs to be taken \u2018to safeguard or promote the child\u2019s welfare\u2019 (s.17).<\/p>\n
Our data findings indicate that the current intervention strategy does not meet either aim.\u00a0 On the contrary, it is found that the amount of detected child abuse as a proportion of referrals has fallen from 24% to 7%.<\/a> This suggests that either many abused children are failing to be referred, or that abused referred children are not being correctly assessed. Moreover, the findings suggest that a large number of families who require support services are needlessly \u2018risk assessed\u2019, potentially without their consent, causing resourcing issues for the social work profession and contributing to a fear of the consequence of missing a serious case of abuse. This scenario may be deterring families seeking services and damaging those who do.<\/p>\n Our data analysis concludes that the current strategy of treating need and abuse as a linear continuum is producing an outcome counter to the intention of policy, and also counter to the interests of children, families and society.<\/p>\n In addition to the data findings, another objective of \u2018Rethinking Child Protection Strategy\u2019 was to investigate the explicit and implicit theory underpinning child protection and safeguarding strategy.\u00a0 We established four new theoretical findings that can be widely applied to contribute to understanding the system:<\/p>\n We firstly identified a number of paradigms that, taken together, inform child protection and safeguarding strategy.\u00a0 This resulted in identification of the Theory of Child Protection <\/em>circuit.\u00a0 Much of our data analysis involved investigating these individual elements to look at the strength of the evidential basis for these paradigms.\u00a0 We concluded that the impact of basing strategy around the Theory of Child Protection decreases the efficiency ratio of the system in relation to child abuse, which is directly at odds with its aim.\u00a0 We identified this phenomenon as the Law of Diminishing Returns Ratio<\/em>. We investigated the reasons for this, which led to the identification of a fundamental problem at the heart of child protection and safeguarding strategy; the \u2018Welfare\/Policing Dichotomy\u2019<\/em><\/a> (Devine, 2015).\u00a0 In addition, we observed a phenomenon we term the Outlier Paradox<\/em> in relation to risk characteristics and the likelihood of effective social work for certain categories of the population.\u00a0 This paradox refers to families at the extreme ends of the referral spectrum where we found that those who are incorrectly referred and resist social work interaction exhibit similar characteristics to those who are correctly referred because they are deliberately and systematically abusing their children.<\/p>\n These theoretical insights enable suggestions to be made for future strategic direction. In order to address the problems we have identified, we suggest a revised framework that respects the separation in the Children Act 1989 between s.17 in Part III and s.47 in Part V.\u00a0 This new ethico-legal framework prioritises consensual work for s.17 referrals and a more robust and controlled forensic examination framework where the threshold for s.47 is met.<\/p>\n Dr Lauren Devine and Mr Stephen Parker, Senior Lecturers in Law at the University of the West of England, Bristol, and Principal and Co-Investigator of \u2018Rethinking Child Protection Strategy\u2019.\u00a0 Correspondence to Lauren.devine@uwe.ac.uk\/<\/a><\/p>\n Further reading: http:\/\/www.esrc.ac.uk\/news-events-and-publications\/evidence-briefings\/child-protection-and-assessment\/<\/a><\/p>\n http:\/\/eprints.uwe.ac.uk\/25258\/1\/Working%20paper%20-%20Rethinking%20child%20protection%20strategy%20-%20learning%20from%20trends.pdf<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" We have just completed our two year, data collection and analysis of child protection and safeguarding referrals and assessment outcomes for the project \u2018Rethinking Child Protection Strategy\u2019, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (Grant number ES\/M000990\/1). The large-scale, … Continue reading \n