3rd Innovation in Information Infrastructures (III) Workshop

Posted on

Robin Williams gave the opening keynote at the 3rd Innovation in Information Infrastructures (III) Workshop (13th – 16th October 2014) hosted by the  University of Oslo, Department of Informatics.

http://www.mn.uio.no/ifi/english/research/news-and-events/events/conferences-and-seminars/iiios2014/

The  previous III workshop at the University of Edinburgh (9-11 October 2012)

http://www.stis.ed.ac.uk/issti/events/events/innovation_in_information_infrastructures

had provided the basis for a recently published special edition of the Journal for the Association of Information Systems  edited by Eric Monteiro, Neil Pollock and Robin Williams.

http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol15/iss4/4/

With this collection of papers, infrastructure studies had  “come of age”, Robin suggested. However more systematic and comparative studies are needed to explicate the Uneven Contours of Information Infrastructure Innovation. We need to understand better the opportunities for, and barriers to generativity and generification – whereby local innovations may be encouraged and come to be widely adopted, incorporated in generic solutions.

 


Upcoming Social Informatics Talk on “Text Mining Careers”

Posted on

This is the blurb of the talk we will give to next friday Social Informatics Forum (10th of October). We have been awarded funding from the Challenge Investment Scheme by Edinburgh University College of Humanities and Social Science to develop a research project that builds links between interpretive/qualitative and data intensive/quantitative research for the study of careers and expertise. By applying a combination of techniques including text mining, sequential analysis and ethnography, the project will explore new ways to respond to the question: how workers build careers across organisations?  By applying sequential analysis to CVs mined from the web, the project will demonstrate the application of text mining technology to a particular type of IT expert career, namely industrial analysts. Extensive study of IT experts’ career patterns will provide insights into how the combination of job positions and the type of organization worked for contributed to acquiring the skills and relationships necessary to build analysts reputation as experts in the IT field.

Project partners are Bea Alex, Alberto Acerbi and Gian Marco Campagnolo.

Beatrice Alex is a Research Fellow at the Institute for Language, Cognition and Computation (ILCC) at the School of Informatics at the University of Edinburgh. Her research interests are in text mining for documents from different domains as well as multi- and mixed-lingual text processing and its applications.  Her ambition is to make archives more accessible to users.

Alberto Acerbi is a cognitive/evolutionary anthropologist with a particular interest in computational science. He has been awarded a British Academy and Royal Society’s Newton Fellowship and he joined, in January 2013, the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Bristol.

Gian Marco Campagnolo is Lecturer in Science, Technology and Innovation Studies at Edinburgh University. He works in the area of the sociology of business knowledge. His research empirically focuses on ICT market intermediaries using a combination of qualitative and digital research methods. His research is exemplified by studies of salespeople, global IT vendors, analysts & consultants.


“Making Use of Digital Research” Invitation Video on-line

Posted on

In the summer of 2014 Gartner released its latest Hype Cycle for Emerging Technology. Now Big Data has moved away from the peak of expectation and it is set to become a productive reality. One example of it starting to get tangible is Scottish Government that in June 2014 published its Data Vision for Scotland. Some questions you may be asking are: what will be the consequence for my organisation? If I am working in government analytics office or in digital marketing, how should I adapt my career development to this fast moving field of big data? In the invitation video recently published on our website, we explain how with more than thirty years of the experience at the forefront of technology & innovation studies, our research group is uniquely positioned to deliver training that answers to those urgent questions. Explained in the video is how the new distance learning programme in “Making Use of Digital Research” will offer the right balance of hard and soft skills for you to become a successful commissioner, coordinator or user of digital research.

 


Visit by leading STS scholar Sampsa Hyyslo

Posted on

We are happy to welcome a long time colleague, Sampsa Hyysalo to Edinburgh bring us up to date on his work programme, and examine the PhD of our own Jee Hyun SUH

Sampsa is Associate professor in co-design at the Aalto School of, Art, Design and Architecture and a Senior Researcher at the Aalto University School of Economics, Helsinki Finland. Sampsa’s research and teaching focus on user involvement in innovation and the co-evolution of technologies, practices and organisations. He also edits the journal Science and Technology Studies.  Sampsa.hyysalo@aalto.fi

Sampsa will give two talks this week.

 Wednesday 1st Oct ISSTI Occasional Public Lecture,

The user dominated technology era: dynamics of dispersed peer-innofusion in Arctic vehicles 

3.30 – 5.30 pm Wednesday 1st October,

Room 183, The University of Edinburgh,  Old College (on the ground floor, on the right side as you enter the the quad)

Abstract

Users invent new products and product categories, but the assumption has been that manufacturers will supplant users if their innovation is of value to many. The current paper examines Russian all terrain vehicles “karakats” to discuss a case of an era of extended user dominated technology and the related dynamics of dispersed peer-innovation. Karakat users have invented, modified, diversified and iterated this technology, as well as continued to self-build and self-maintain it. These vehicles are wide spread, have half a century of history and hundreds of design variants. Manufacturers serve only a small subsection of the market, albeit they have established new markets based on karakat principles. To make sense of the phenomenon, we combine concepts from user innovation research and science & technology studies. We find that the combinatory effect of previously known dynamics related on users in innovation offers a plausible explanation for the user dominance and dispersed peer innofusion pattern, which we elaborate.

Friday 3rd October 9:30-11:00,  Social Informatics Cluster 

Collaborative futuring with and by makers

Sampsa Hyysalo, Cindy Kohtala, Pia Helminen & Samuli Mäkinen

Informatics Forum 

Maker spaces and maker activities are rapidly proliferating and evolving phenomena at the interface of lay and professional design offering access to low-cost digital fabrication equipment. They also come in many varieties and change fast, presenting a difficult target for, for instance, public authorities, who would like to cater for them but operate in much slower planning cycles. As part of participatory planning of Helsinki Central Library, we experimented with a form of collaborative futuring with and by makers. By drawing elements from both lead-user workshops and participatory design we conducted a futuring workshop, which allowed engaging the local maker communities in identifying the issues relevant for public maker space for 2020. It further engaged the participants into envisioning a smaller prototype maker space and invited them into realizing its activities. The workshop results and post evaluation indicate that particularly the gained solution information was of high relevance to library planners, as was the possibility to trial and elaborate activities on a rolling basis in the prototype space. The more general trends in making for 2020 were useful too, but to a lesser extent, and it is likely that just these could have been gained with more traditional futuring means.

Keywords: makers, futuring, lead users, lead-user workshop, participatory design, hands-on future, full scale modeling, extended co-design.


Social Informatics cluster seminars for Autumn 2014

Posted on

The Social Informatics Cluster is a vibrant forum where academics from Informatics, Business Studies, Science Technology and Innovation Studies, and Medicine collaborate to further the interdisciplinary study of the social aspects of computing. The weekly Edinburgh Social Informatics cluster talks resume next week after a long summer break but with a hugely exiting programme featuring local contributors, international visitors (including Kalle Lyytinen, one of the most influential scholars in IS at the moment) as well as old friends.

The Social Informatics Cluster  website has videos and details of previous talks

Where: Informatics Forum every Friday morning, coffee available 1.16 between 9.30 and 11.00am.

Friday 19th September – Efrem Mallach 

Jointly with the Business School and with thanks to Neil Pollock

“Forty Years in Analyst Relations: A Personal Retrospective”?

Dr. Efrem Mallach, one of the founders of Industry Analyst Relations, is Research Director at Kea Company. Efrem is one of the top experts in the world on Analyst Relations. Efrem’s role combines consulting to Kea Company clients with developing research methodologies, measurement tools and best practices.

Efrem has been involved in Analyst Relations since the late 1970s, when he represented Honeywell Information Systems’ minicomputer division to the then-nascent industry analyst community. As a consultant and an industry analyst in the mid-1980s, he saw that vendors with whom he worked, often did not know how to work with people like himself – to their detriment, since consultants and analysts influenced a large fraction of their sales. He therefore began to consult with those vendors to improve the effectiveness of their analyst/consultant relations programs.

In 1987 he wrote the first edition of “WIN THEM OVER: A Survival Guide for Corporate Analyst/Consultant Relations Programs”, devoted entirely to helping information technology firms optimise their relationships with consultants and analysts. In 1992 Efrem co-founded Kensington Group, an Analyst Relations consultancy of which he was CEO until his return to academia in 2002. Efrem is based in New England, a region where many of the  major analyst houses are headquartered and teaches business courses at a nearby university.

Watch an interview with Efrem here

Friday 26th September – Jee Hyun Suh

Jee is currently completing her PhD  at the University of Edinburgh on The co-evolution of an emerging mobile technology and mobile services: A study of the distributed governance of technological innovation through the case of WiBro in South Korea.

Friday 3rd October – Sampsa Hyysalo, Professor, INUSE User and Innovation research group, Aalto University School of Art and Design

Watch a video of his TED  talk here

Friday 10th October – Alberto Acerbi 

Friday 17th October – Farjam Eshraghian 

Friday 24th October – Kalle Lyytinen , Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences in the University of Jyväskylä

In conjunction with the Institute for the study of science and technology (ISSTI).

Making and breaking rules in information technology (IT) rich environments: The role of meaning and time in organisational regulation

The materialization of rules in Information Technology (IT) and their impact on practice have been rarely explored. A review of literature not only shows that IT is poorly conceptualized in studies of organizational regulation; especially, the social meaning of materialized rules and the time period of their impact has been ignored. The current pervasive use IT to regulate organizational behaviors warrants an exploratory study to theorize about the ternary relationships between rules, IT, and practices. To this end we trace IT uses that embed regulatory episodes (where behaviors are regulated by rules) during the implementation and assimilation of an e-learning system at a French university.  The study helps us disentangle how rules become materialized in IT rich environments and how their interpretation unfolds in practice. Through regulatory episodes, we identify five meaningful modalities of organizational regulation in IT rich environments. Our analysis helps also formulate four conjectures about the dynamics of IT based organizational regulation. The implications of our findings are relevant for the theories of organizational regulation and the management of compliance.

Kalle Lyytinen (PhD, Computer Science, University of Jyvaskyla; Dr. h.c. from Umeå University) is Iris S. Wolstein professor at Case Western Reserve University, a CIIR professor at University of Umeå, Sweden and a visiting professor at London School of Economics, U.K..  He is currently Associate Dean of Research and the Academic Director of the Doctor of Management Programs at Weatherhead School of Management. Between 1992 and 2012 he was the 3rd most productive scholar in the IS field when measured by the AIS basket of 8 journals; he is currently among the 5 most cited scholars in the IS field based on his adjusted h-index (67). He is LEO Award recipient (2013), AIS fellow (2004), and the former chairperson of IFIP WG 8.2. He has published around 300 refereed articles and edited or written nearly 20 books or special issues on the nature of IS discipline, system design, method engineering, computer supported cooperative work, standardization, ubiquitous computing, social networks. He recently edited a special issue to Organization Science on digital innovation and has recently finished a special issue to MISQ on social communications and symbolic aspects of information systems and a special issue to ISR on the Information Technology and Future of Work. He is currently editing a special to MISQ on digitally enabled innovation. He is involved in research that explores IT induced radical innovation in software development, digitalization of complex design processes, requirements discovery and modeling for large scale systems, and digital infrastructures especially for mobile services.

Friday 7th November – Ali Eshrahi 


Thinking about my Producing Data talk

Posted on

producing

I am thinking about my ten minute introduction for next week’s Producing Data event.

I want to talk about data visualisation as a profession and its position in the data supply chain. I am reminiscent as I write of Micheal Pryke’s very interesting paper on the “money eye” when he says ““Numbers are not everything”. Interestingly,  Pryke’s is one of the few papers where fieldworker ventures into the realm of computational architecture groups that are responsible of shaping the way (analyst and ourselves) perceive markets.

volatility smile

Next tuesday 2nd of September we will have the privilege of hosting one of them. I met Hermann Zchiegner of www.two-n.com thanks to our common friend and colleague Gordon Haywood in 2012. Hermann was Edinburgh to work to a new data visualisation project at Wood MacKenzie and I interviewed him. Here is one excerpt:

Hermann Zchiegner: “Working with data you are working with something that is there, that is factual. Applying a visualization layer on top of data brings a certain bias with it. You know, based on the same dataset, it can create two very different sorts of pictures. This is one of the biggest challenges of data visualization anyway…to have as much as you can an unbiased view, unless is serving the purpose. I want to help me making an argument with these sets of data. That’s a different kind of story. There is this unbiased view: give me the data, let me help you understand the data, let the data speak to you. The role of the dataviz guy is in a certain way very much so a creative process because you are creating something out of the context of the data that in itself becomes something new, that stands for itself. There is this big difference between data visualization and this big thing that is becoming more and more predominant that is infographics. Data visualization relies of data sets where we have data notes in the hundreds of thousands. Infographics usually deals with small datasets and its purpose is always artistic: I drawing you a picture of a fact. Whilst data visualization is open ended because you are just creating a framework for the data to speak but you are not creating an end product. You are really just creating the framework.”

What I really wanted to understand at that time was when and to what extent pictures bias numbers. I really wanted to find an evidence of this performativity. Hermann’s words hinted at that direction.

My research progressed from that into the study of how even the simple figurations – the dot, the line, the list, the two by two matrix make a difference. I read with great enjoyment Micheal Lynch description of the ‘device of the dot’, Tim Ingold book – an entire book! – on the line. And Chris Carter and Mark Kornberger’s analysis of how a list can make a difference, creating competition between previously unrelated entities and magnifying irrelevant difference (such as the difference between ‘first’ and ‘second’).

I worked over the last few years on the idea that even big numbers and complex calculations need to come down to something people can communicate and understand. Something that they can use to take decisions.My own empirical field of research being the IT market – IT business consultancy and analysis – I started doing research in collaboration with Neil Pollock on the (in)famous Magic Quadrant.

gartner-e-discovery-magic-quadrant-2012

A very simple but very influential figuration in business analysis. What people see in it? I found that watching the Magic Quadrant the trained eye can recognise at a glance that a mature market has the shape of a “rugby ball”. I also discover that to be effective, a certain (very well defined) number of entities need to be represented. When not enough entities (vendors) are naturally available in a market, the “range” need to be somehow produced. We therefore also discovered that the matrix is not only about taking away, simplifying. it is also about adding sometime.

However, fascination for more complex visualisations and dynamic datasets never abandoned me. Since my last meeting with Gordon I also drafted a new course, part of our new distance learning programme in “Making Use of Digital Research” (yes thanks for finding the title creative!). The course is about “Understanding Data Visualisation” and will host talks from a number of data designers. There we will discuss with students the difference between pie chart, bar chart, heat maps and all the most popular figurations to represent dynamic datasets. Also Gartner seems to have turned to a more dynamic magic quadrant nowadays!

Let’s see where we are when Hermann visits us next in 2016!

Ciao,

Gian Marco


Gain the advantage: Study online for a recognised qualification in Digital Research

Posted on

postgrad-banner-1192

Contemporary interest in big data, data science and large-scale digital research presents an opportunity for researchers and practitioners alike.  National and global strategy on gearing up for the challenges of big data means there has never been a better time for professional development. Join us.

“Information is the oil of the 21st century, and analytics is the combustion engine.” (Gartner Predictions)

This Postgraduate Certificate is aimed at commissioners, coordinators and users of digital research in business, policy-making and the third sector, including digital marketing and analytical services officers. The PGCert comprises a suite of courses that together provide the critical understanding and skills needed to make best use of digital research findings, with a particular focus on social media research, web 2.0 data and their synergies with publicly available ‘open’ administrative datasets. Based on the latest research into the social and economic influences on how digital research is being developed and used, this PGCert is designed both for novices and for more experienced professionals who need to maintain a critical appreciation of the fast moving field of digital research.

“I’ve seen too many organisations give up on finding answers in complex data; this is the first award-bearing programme that helps people without a data science background to transform their ability to share information and make it easily accessible.” Duncan Chapple, Managing Director, Kea Company.

Please note that the deadline for applications for 2014/15 entry is the is the end of December 2014 for a January 2015 start.

rob proctor


Producing data: practices, materialities, values

Posted on

digital

An interdisciplinary symposium

3rd – 4th September 2014, Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Innovation, University of Edinburgh

Hosted by: Design Informatics, Edinburgh College of Art, University of Edinburgh

Organisers: Chris Speed, Gian Marco Campagnolo, Siobhan Magee and New Media Scotland

Keynotes: Sian Lindley (Microsoft Research), Sophie Woodward (University of Manchester), Hermann Zschiegner (TWO-N)

Confirmed speakers and artists: Bea Alex, Chris Barker, Mina Braun, Jamie Cross, Ewan Klein, Craig Martin, Hadi Mehrpouya, Mitch Miller, Wendy Moncur, Larissa Pschetz, Mark Selby, Duncan Shingleton, Alice Street, Arno Verhoeven.


The term ‘data’ is ubiquitous across our homes and workplaces, academic and mainstream media, political discourses and ethical disputes. Sometimes its presence can take the form of representations of various facets of our lives, such as statistics or visualisations of figures. Data is a part of the contracts that we make with each other, companies that we deal with, and the fallout of the devices that we use. Our positions within these relationships change our competences based upon whether we are a professional producer of data or an amateur. In other instances, ‘data’ appears not as information in its own right, but as a lens through which to discuss, and often critique, governments and corporations. The reverberations of Big Data controversies for example, suggest that data is developing to be one of the key political issues of our time: a point of convergence for politics and economics, technology, and statecraft.

Despite, or perhaps because of, this ubiquity, the meaning of data is blurred. However, rather than calling for the creation of a rigid definition of data, this context suggests the need for comparison and discussion.

The majority of the symposium will be made up of keynote presentations and shorter presentations from invited speakers. On the second day, attendees will participate in a workshop and later a discussion session about ideas that have emerged over the course of the event. The symposium will include opportunities for attendees to discuss their own work with speakers. An exhibition of visual/ sensory works that question what data is and how it is produced will run in tandem with the talks and presentations.


The symposium will be held at the Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Innovation.
3rd September: 1pm – 6pm.
4th September 9am – 4pm.

All attendees are invited to Jelly and Gin’s ‘data dinner’ at the Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Innovation at 8pm on 3rd September. www.jellyandgin.com

This event is free but ticketed. To register, please visit http://producingdata.eventbrite.com


Identifying ICT poles of excellence, and potential for ‘big data’ approaches in policy support

Posted on

Big-data.Red_-300x206

Informal Seminar
Dr Giuditta de Prato, JRC-IPTS, European Commission

Friday 11 July 10:00-11:30
Seminar Room, Old Surgeons Hall,
High School Yards

Dr Giuditta de Prato, of the European Commission DG Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) will present an informal seminar on the IPTS work to identify and analyse leading technology innovation centres to support EC industry policy.

This was conducted as part of the European ICT Poles of Excellence (EIPE) project for DG CNECT.

She will present the results of the study, and discuss the methodology for creating indicators using multiple data sets. This will be followed by thoughts on how this policy research of this type can be carried forward using ‘big data’ techniques.

Dr Giuditta De Prato

Giuditta De Prato is a permanent staff member at the JRC IPTS working on projects on the economic aspects of the Information Society and on the impacts of Information Society Technologies, mainly focusing on ICT R&D, the software sector, patents and innovation, including projects such as PREDICT . She uses social network analysis, data mining and qualitative methods, bring together national statistics, company data, and technology-based indicators.

She has a PhD in Economics and Institutions from the University of Bologna (Italy). Before joining IPTS, she was a software developer and IT consultant from 1992 to 2005. Before joint the European Commission, in 2009 she was a research assistant, focussing on research activities on local development, evaluation, ICT and open source at the University of Bologna, where she also lectured on macroeconomics and environmental economics.

Recent publications cover topics such as the internationalisation of ICT R&D, with a focus on Asia and Europe, the structure of the video games industry, and she recently co-edited a book, Digital Media Worlds, The New Economy of Media (Palgrave, 2014)


Digital Research Newsletters

Posted on

digitalresearch small banner

Our previous news has been posted on two newsletters available here.